|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Admiral Pelleon
White Shadow Imperium
Z.E.R.G
   |
Posted - 2010.04.26 17:55:00 -
[1]
HI PL THX FOR THE 11 SUPERCARRIER HOTDROP IN LOWSEC ~~
________
|
Admiral Pelleon
White Shadow Imperium
Z.E.R.G
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 18:16:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Liang Nuren
You were in a Phantasm?
-Liang
It's my favorite ship, regardless of its class performance. 
________
|
Admiral Pelleon
White Shadow Imperium
Z.E.R.G
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 21:17:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Xtover
Edited by: Xtover on 26/04/2010 19:45:40
Originally by: Admiral Pelleon
HI PL THX FOR THE 11 SUPERCARRIER HOTDROP IN LOWSEC ~~
REQUESTED TO DOCK
DOCKING OPERATION ALREADY IN PROGRESS
REQUESTED TO DOCK
DOCKING OPERATION ALREADY IN PROGRESS
You were playing station games anyway.
Phantasm vs 11 supercarriers.
I HAD A CHANCE DONT HATE ME.
________
|
Admiral Pelleon
White Shadow Imperium
Z.E.R.G
|
Posted - 2010.04.27 01:04:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Viper ****zIe
Originally by: Liang Nuren
No, I can definitely bring a ship that counters them... the simple fact is that the counters in low sec are much less powerful and numerous than the counters in 0.0.
-Liang
So you'd have a ship that costs 11b to build, requires an alt account to use, can't dock, can't "disengage" on-grid (i.e mwd away) and allow it to be scrambled by any scrub in a t1 frigate (or ibis~) when there's already a dedicated ship that would allow you to do all of this?
And you'd leave other EW-immune ships alone when they are just as powerful if not more powerful in specific situations?
Really?
CCP should hire you, sounds like you know what you're talking about.
I think his point is that they're more powerful in low sec than they are in null, simply because there are less options available to tie them down. At least titans lose their primary function in low sec.
________
|
Admiral Pelleon
White Shadow Imperium
Z.E.R.G
|
Posted - 2010.04.30 01:32:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Asruv'ynn
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Then you aren't paying attention and haven't really read the thread. Supercarriers are more powerful in low sec than in 0.0 because their natural counters do not exist or do not work. Therefore there is a natural incentive to use them in a place where they are harder to counter.
-Liang
I should have clarified that. I meant I understand your reasoning, but I don't see that as the case in-game. Undoubtedly, that does give them a natural incentive to abuse lowsec, but frankly I don't see that happening. Most of them aren't irresponsible with their capitals and keep them for fleets in nullsec; or are owned and operated by lowsec alliances. I also find it funnny that you keep conveniently nit-pick little parts of posts than actually looking at the big picture.
If this was an actual balance issue, CCP would do something about it, however since it is not, it will remain a social problem in regards to whom you choose as your neighbors.
I find it amusing that you think CCP is 'on the ball' in terms of balance problems. In terms of you not seeing this happen, many, many other people do. I don't particularly mind it tbh (mostly because I'm not stupid enough to get tackled by a freaking capital), but I do believe that they're a bit overpowered in low sec simply because of the fewer options available to tie one down. I like the thought of removing the ability to receive RR in low sec, or perhaps removing the infini-sensor strength in low and allowing them to be target jammed like a normal carrier.
________
|
|
|
| |
|